Search for: "MICHAEL RODENBERGER"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2012, 9:53 pm
Curran and Michael D. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:16 am
Michael Fronstin, Dr. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
It has been seven years since Michael McCann, a law professor and SI.com contributor, found that players who came straight from high school fared better — in terms of on-court contributions and off-court “behavior” — than players who attended college for any length. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:50 pm
Michael Fronstin, 75, of Palm Beach Gardens; Dr. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
Will be interesting to see if NBA2K13 works its ways into the O'Bannon litigation.Update 1:45 PM: Great point by Ryan Rodenberg on Twitter:@McCannSportsLaw Also interesting to note that then-college player Christian Laettner is part of the game (and negotiated his own deal?). [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:00 am
This panel discusses how analytics are used in areas such as talent identification, contract negotiation, gambling corruption prevention, and antitrust litigationPanelists: · Robert Forbes ('07), Proskauer Rose· Ryan Rodenberg, Professor, Florida State University· Kelly Wilson, Assistant Counsel, Under Armour · Moderated by Thomas Nachbar, Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am
” At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf explains why Jesner v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
At ESPN, Ryan Rodenberg reports on Monday’s argument in Christie v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
Commentary comes from Sarah Seo in The Washington Post and from Michael Dorf at Dorf on Law. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
” Marissa Rivera and Michael Chou preview the case for Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
Rodenberg & Andrea N. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Lahav Mass Tort Litigation Blog Cornell M Michael C. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak and Michael Shear report that “[t]he court’s decision not to hear the administration’s appeal was expected, as no appeals court has yet ruled on the issue. [read post]
